08/29/2023 / By Arsenio Toledo
The administration of President Joe Biden is expected to bring back full Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) lockdowns beginning this fall to meddle with the 2024 presidential elections.
This is according to whistleblowers from the United States Border Patrol and the Transport Security Administration (TSA), who informed InfoWars that the lockdowns will begin by mid-September with the incremental reintroduction of restrictions. (Related: TSA and Border Patrol officials reveal Biden’s plan to reinstate full COVID lockdown measures.)
According to the sources, including one high-level TSA official, some of the first restrictions to return will be mandatory masking requirements for TSA and other airport employees. By mid-October, these same policies will be required for pilots, flight staff, and eventually passengers and other airport patrons.
A high-level Border Patrol source confirmed that these same directives will be given to Border Patrol officials. The agency was told that it was a matter of “if,” not “when” official COVID-19 numbers will start climbing back up, and in response to this, by mid-October most of the agency will return to forced masking.
“InfoWars’ analysis is clear: This new rollout’s timing is perfect for the embattled Biden administration to put the country back in a state of civil emergency and even martial law to further divide and confuse the public and move forward with the greatest election meddling in history,” wrote the InfoWars editorial board in its report.
Attorney Tom Renz, on his Brighteon.TV program “Lawfare with Tom Renz,” agreed with InfoWars’ assessment.
“He needs to steal 2024 to have any chance of winning. 2024, there’s zero chance [of Biden winning] unless they can have the same sort of corruption that they had in 2020,” he said. “We are at a crossroads in this country, folks. We have an election coming. That’s the most consequential election in American history. I would say even more so than the Civil War elections.
Following the release of this report, the TSA, the White House and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have all repeatedly denied that they are going to roll out new COVID-19 lockdown regulations.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the TSA claimed that no such announcement was made to TSA managers regarding the gradual reintroduction of COVID-19 lockdown protocols. “TSA is unaware of such a requirement,” said the TSA spokesperson. “There was no TSA meeting on the topic.”
A spokesperson for the CDC similarly made a statement refuting InfoWars‘ claims. “These rumors are utterly false,” said CDC spokesperson Nick Spinelli.
“The restrictions that were [reintroduced] on businesses, on going to the movie theater, on going to the retail mall … all of those were done by states and local governments, not the federal government,” claimed Northeastern University public health law expert and professor Wendy E. Parmet in an interview. “The ‘lockdown’ terminology is certainly a misnomer… It is conspiracy thinking and it’s catastrophizing.”
All of this is despite the fact that universities all over the U.S. are reinstituting mask mandates, schools are being forced to shut down due to COVID-19 cases and the Biden administration providing over $1.4 billion in taxpayer-funded subsidies and tax credits to Big Pharma to make new, updated COVID-19 vaccines by September.
Read the latest news involving the government and the possible return of lockdowns in America at Pandemic.news.
Watch the full episode of “Lawfare with Tom Renz” below as he discusses Biden’s lockdown plans and their links to the 2024 elections.
Tune in to “Lawfare with Tom Renz” every Tuesday from 11:30 a.m. to noon and Saturday from 12:30 to 1 p.m. on Brighteon.TV.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
2024 presidential elections, big government, conspiracy, corruption, covid-19, deception, election fraud, health freedom, InfoWars, insanity, Joe Biden, lies, lockdowns, medical fascism, medical martial law, Medical Tyranny, pandemic, rigged, vote fraud
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author