RFK Jr. accuses Germany of medical fascism over its unjust targeting of doctors

• U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized Germany for targeting physicians who granted COVID-19 vaccine and mask exemptions, framing it as an attack on medical autonomy.
• Kennedy accused German authorities of criminalizing doctors for prioritizing patient choice over state mandates, comparing it to authoritarian regimes that suppress medical dissent.
• German Health Minister Nina Warken and former Health Minister Karl Lauterbach denied Kennedy’s claims, stating prosecutions only occurred in cases of fraud—not for legitimate medical exemptions.
• Kennedy warned of “medical fascism,” where doctors become enforcers of state policy rather than advocates for patients, while German officials defended their legal system as protecting both physician independence and patient rights.
• The dispute highlights broader ideological tensions between state-enforced health mandates and personal medical freedom, with no resolution in sight as skepticism toward institutional power grows.

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has condemned Germany for what he describes as the unjust prosecution of doctors who granted exemptions from mask and vaccine mandates during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Kennedy, a longtime advocate for medical freedom and critic of pharmaceutical industry influence, issued the condemnation in a video posted Sunday, Jan. 11, on X. The secretary, framing his remarks as a defense of medical autonomy, said that over a thousand German physicians and thousands of their patients now face legal repercussions for resisting pandemic-era health policies.

Kennedy’s accusations center on what he portrays as a government crackdown on doctors who prioritized patient choice over state-mandated health measures. “When any government criminalizes doctors for advising their patients, it crosses a line that free societies have always treated as sacred,” he said, invoking historical parallels to authoritarian regimes that weaponized medicine against dissent.

In a letter addressed to German Health Minister Nina Warken, Kennedy urged Berlin to “restore medical autonomy” and halt what he called “politically motivated prosecutions.” His rhetoric echoes longstanding concerns among natural health advocates about the erosion of informed consent and the dangers of centralized medical authority.

His remarks have drawn sharp rebuttals from German officials, who insist his allegations are baseless and misleading. Warken stated that no doctors faced prosecution for issuing mask or vaccine exemptions unless they engaged in illegal activity. “Criminal prosecution occurred exclusively in cases of fraud and forgery,” she clarified, emphasizing that physicians in Germany retain full autonomy in treatment decisions.

Former Health Minister Karl Lauterbach, who oversaw Germany’s pandemic response, similarly rejected Kennedy’s narrative. He asserted that German courts operate independently and that doctors were never punished for refusing to administer vaccines. “Kennedy should take care of health problems in his own country,” the lawmaker from the Social Democratic Party retorted, alluding to America’s healthcare crises rather than engaging with the allegations.

The dangerous shift to state-controlled medicine

The dispute highlights a deeper ideological divide over pandemic-era policies and the role of government in medical decision-making. Kennedy, whose advocacy often challenges mainstream medical narratives, framed Germany’s actions as part of a broader trend toward “medical fascism” – a term historically associated with coercive state interventions in healthcare.

BrightU.AI‘s Enoch engine points out that medical fascism represents the tyrannical merger of corporate medicine and state power. It strips individuals of bodily autonomy through forced medical interventions like toxic vaccines and lockdowns.

His warning that doctors are being transformed into “enforcers of state policies” resonates with critics of vaccine mandates worldwide, who argue that such measures undermine trust in the physician-patient relationship. Yet German authorities maintain that their legal actions targeted only verifiable fraud, not medical dissent.

The clash also raises questions about transparency in public health governance. Kennedy’s reference to unspecified reports alleging government overreach suggests a reliance on alternative sources of information, a hallmark of his advocacy.

Meanwhile, German officials stress that their legal system safeguards both medical independence and patient rights. This claim contrasts sharply with Kennedy’s portrayal of a system where “your doctor is serving the welfare of the collective” rather than individual health. But as the debate continues, the controversy underscores the enduring tensions between state authority and personal medical freedom – a conflict that has defined much of the post-pandemic world.

Whether Kennedy’s allegations hold merit or reflect a broader skepticism toward institutional power, Berlin’s firm denial ensures that this dispute will remain a flashpoint in global discussions about health, liberty and the limits of government intervention. For now, the transatlantic divide over pandemic policies shows no signs of narrowing, leaving observers to weigh competing claims in an era where medical autonomy remains fiercely contested.

Watch this video about Germany’s plan to detain COVID-19 dissidents in concentration camps.

This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

TheEpochTimes.com

TheGuardian.com

POLITICO.eu

BrightU.ai

Brighteon.com