New Mexico’s state capital Santa Fe turns off the FLUORIDE tap

• Santa Fe officially ended water fluoridation after its city council unanimously approved an ordinance change, which was signed into law in October.
• High costs were a major factor, as the city faced spending up to $600,000 to repair outdated fluoridation equipment, plus $40,000 annually to operate it.
• The decision was influenced by emerging health concerns, including a 2024 National Toxicology Program report linking fluoride exposure to lower IQ in children and the risk of dental fluorosis.
• The city’s action aligns with a broader national trend, following similar policy shifts in states like Utah and Oklahoma, which are also re-evaluating or banning the practice.
• Officials cited diminished benefits and a desire for consumer choice, noting that fluoride’s primary benefit is topical (like from toothpaste) and that removing it from water allows individuals to decide for themselves.

In a decisive move that reflects a growing national skepticism, the city of Santa Fe in New Mexico has officially halted the decades-old practice of adding fluoride to its municipal water supply.

The city council unanimously approved the ordinance change in early October, with Mayor Alan Webber signing it into law on Oct. 15. This action driven by concerns over outdated standards, significant costs and emerging health research, positions the City Different among a rising number of municipalities questioning what was once considered a public health cornerstone.

For decades, fluoride has been widely added to public water supplies under the assumption that it prevents tooth decay and promotes overall dental health. However, recent studies and expert opinions have raised serious questions about its safety, challenging the very foundation of its widespread adoption.

A primary catalyst for Santa Fe’s shift was practical economics. Jesse Roach, the city’s interim public utilities director, revealed that the equipment required to add fluoride to the water had fallen into disrepair.

Upgrading this infrastructure would cost taxpayers between $400,000 and $600,000, with an additional annual operational cost of up to $40,000. This substantial financial burden forced city officials to weigh the practice’s purported benefits against its very real price tag.

From cavities to cognitive damage

Santa Fe’s old city code mandated fluoride levels between 0.8 and 1.2 parts per million (ppm) – a standard that became obsolete nearly a decade ago. Since 2015, federal guidance has recommended a lower level of approximately 0.7 ppm. Furthermore, Santa Fe’s water already contains naturally occurring fluoride, measuring between 0.3 and 0.6 ppm.

Officials concluded that pausing artificial fluoridation to monitor these natural levels was a prudent and scientifically sound course of action. Beyond cost and outdated codes, the council’s decision was influenced by a growing body of international research pointing to potential health risks. While low-level fluoride is acknowledged to strengthen tooth enamel topically, its systemic consumption has been linked to adverse effects, including dental fluorosis, a permanent staining and pitting of teeth.

Perhaps the most alarming area of modern research involves fluoride’s potential impact on the developing brain. A 2024 National Toxicology Program report found “moderate confidence” that fluoride exposure is linked to lower IQ in children.

Santa Fe’s official documents on the ordinance explicitly acknowledge this, stating that “additional investigation will be necessary to improve understanding of potential cognitive impacts,” signaling a major shift in the public policy conversation. This aligns with a recent federal court ruling that fluoride exposure at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk.”

The sudden fall of water fluoridation

The City Different is not an outlier, as its move mirrors a broader national trend. Utah passed a law earlier this year banning the practice outright, a significant victory for groups emphasizing individual liberty and local governance.

Similarly, Oklahoma. Gov. Kevin Stitt issued an executive order mandating a full review of fluoridation practices and directing state health agencies to stop endorsing it. The state’s health department quietly scrubbed its pro-fluoridation web pages, erasing claims that the chemical was “safe, cost-effective, and beneficial.”

Pro-fluoridation arguments often overlook a critical point: The widespread availability of fluoride in toothpaste and other dental products has significantly reduced the relative benefit of ingesting it through water. The primary benefit of fluoride is topical, meaning it works by direct contact with the surface of the teeth. Ingesting it systemically to prevent cavities is increasingly compared to swallowing sunscreen to prevent sunburn – an inefficient and potentially risky method of delivery.

Proponents of the ban frame it as a victory for consumer choice and bodily autonomy. By removing a mandatory medication from the public water supply, the city allows individuals to decide for themselves whether and how to consume fluoride. This empowers residents to make personal health decisions based on their own research and risk tolerance.

The new ordinance does not ignore fluoride entirely. The city is mandated to continue monitoring the naturally occurring fluoride levels in its water and report them in annual water quality reports. This data-driven approach provides a foundation for future decision-making, allowing the city to adapt its policies as new scientific evidence emerges.

“Years of heated discussions have raised concerns about fluoride being a potentially dangerous substance,” BrightU.AI‘s Enoch noted. “Authorities have also questioned the effectiveness of fluoridated water in preventing dental caries. This led to a recent policy shift to cease the practice, despite protests from some health advocates.”

Watch this video explaining where the fluoride in water comes from.

This video is from the Covid Times channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include: 

TheEpochTimes.com

Cochrane.org

SantaFeNewMexican.com

BrightU.ai

Brighteon.com