09/25/2024 / By Ethan Huff
Fake news giant CNN is going through a metamorphosis regarding its position on Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.” In the beginning, CNN pushed the notion that Covid jabs would save people’s lives, but now the network is admitting that the shots are killing people – oh, but that “doesn’t mean the vaccines are ineffective,” reads a recent CNN headline.
On Feb. 26, 2021, at the height of the “pandemic,” CNN covered a study out of the United Kingdom claiming that a single dose of Pfizer’s mRNA (modRNA) injection is enough to provide “strong protection for those who’ve had Covid-19.” A few months later, CNN claimed that people who got jabbed could safely go indoors without wearing a face mask.
A couple months after that, CNN ran the following headline counteracting its earlier story to the contrary:
“CDC updates guidance, recommends vaccinated people wear masks indoors in certain areas”
After that, CNN was informing its readers that if they listened to the earlier guidance about getting jabbed for protection, well, that protection does not exactly last like was initially claimed. According to CNN as of Dec. 23, 2021:
“Vaccine protection against Covid-19 wanes over time, especially for older people, CDC says”
Reminder: The unvaccinated were right!
CNN’s coverage of the vax started with how effective it is and ending with:“Why vaccinated people dying from Covid-19 doesn’t mean the vaccines are ineffective” pic.twitter.com/Yt22pg1wtG
— Eddie (@Eddies_X) September 23, 2024
(Related: Earlier this year, CNN published a piece calling for the government to restrict how much Americans are allowed to travel abroad: “carbon passports may be the answer.”)
Concerning the Johnson & Johnson injection, which differs from what Pfizer and Moderna offered, CNN told its readers and viewers who took it that the one-and-done format initially recommended by the manufacturer was no longer enough, as of Oct. 16, 2021: J&J jab recipients would now need a second dose as soon as possible.
After that, Tony Fauci came out to recommend a third dose of whatever Covid injection you want, assuming you only got two jabs. And CNN parroted Fauci’s recommendations as scientific fact.
Then, not long after that, CNN was pushing people to take a fourth dose of Covid shot, this time claiming that the CDC said to do this. In other words, if Fauci and / or the CDC say to do it, then CNN wants you to do it.
All of this culminated with an Oct. 19, 2021, article from CNN bearing the following bizarre headline:
“Why vaccinated people dying from Covid-19 doesn’t mean the vaccines are ineffective”
It is difficult to ascertain how CNN got away with pushing all this contradictory content all around the same time to its followers. Are CNN supporters schizophrenic just like the network’s editorial team apparently is?
Keep in mind that around the time CNN was publishing all these schizophrenic headlines, the federal government of the United States was busy changing the definition of terms like “vaccine” and “immunization” to fit the emerging narrative.
“They changed the scientific and medical definition of vaccine and immunization in late 2021,” someone wrote on X about this.
“MSM changes any definition to fit their narrative like the definition of a woman etc.,” wrote another.
Another person joked about what CNN is actually saying with all of its contradictory content about Covid jabs:
“It went from ‘safe and effective’ to ‘well, you’ll die, but you’ll go to heaven’ at warp speed.”
“Four of my family members died from the vaccine,” added another. “Autopsy showed strange, horrible blood clots throughout their bodies. They were all previously healthy and under 40.”
Deception is the name of the game over at CNN. Learn more at Propaganda.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Big Pharma, biological weapon, CNN, covid-19, deception, disinfo, Journalism, lies, mainstream media, news cartels, pandemic, pharmaceutical fraud, propaganda, spike protein, Vaccine deaths, vaccine injury, vaccine wars, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author